On March 15, 2024, a divided U.S. Supreme Court decided Pulsifer v. United States. The case involved the “safety valve,” a statutory provision that allows federal judges to sentence drug trafficking defendants below an otherwise applicable mandatory minimum penalty provided the defendant meets several criteria. In this article that was published in Westlaw Today, Alan Ellis and Mark Allenbaugh discuss how the decision thwarts sentencing reform.
Does Pulsifer pulverize sentencing reform?
Alan Ellis
Alan Ellis is a criminal defense lawyer with offices in San Francisco and New York, with more than 50 years of experience as a practicing lawyer, law professor and federal law clerk. He is a nationally recognized authority in the fields of federal sentencing, prison matters, appeals, habeas corpus 2255 motions and international prisoner transfer treaties.
Author Posts